The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, brought into force from 1st June 1970, was a very common controversial piece of legislation.
The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, was enacted to ensure that the operation of the economic system does not result in the concentration of the economic power in hands of few, to provide the control of monopolies, to prohibit monopolistic and restrictive trade policies. The MRTP act extends to the whole of India except Jammu and Kashmir.
The MRTP act sought to prevent the concentration of economic power to the common detriment by preventing those developments which might result in the concentration of economic power such as substantial expansion of existing undertaking, mergers and amalgamations, takeovers and interconnection of undertakings.
The MRTP act was significantly amended in 1982, 1984, 1985 and 1991.
The amendement of 1985 was to raise the asset threshold of undertaking(s) from Rs. 20 crore to Rs. 100 crore for applying the provisions of the MRTP act relating to prevention of concentration of economic power
• Repeal of the provisions of Act pertaining to concetrating of economic power i.e. investments limits, except the provisions empowering the government to defuse concentration of economic power to the common detriment.
• The provisions of the MRTP Act pertaining to the concentration of economic power were much crticized because of their negative impact on growth and competition.
A monopolistic trade practice is a trade practice which has, or is likely to have, the effect of reasonably preventing or lessening competition in the production, supply or distribution of any goods and services, limiting technical development and capital investment to the common detriment , or allowing the quality of good and services to deteriorate.
A monopolistic trade practice shall be deemed to be prejudicial to the public interest, if having regard to the economic conditions prevailing in the country, and to all other matters which are relevant in the particular circumstances, the effect of the trade practice is or would be:
• To increase unreasonably the cost relating to the production, supply or distribution of goods or the performance of any service.
• To increase unreasonably the price at which the goods are sold, the profits derived from the production, supply or distribution of any goods(including their sale or purchase) or from the performance of any service.
• To reduce or limit unreasonably competition in the production, supply or distribution of any goods (including their sale or purchase) or the provision of any service.
• To limit or prevent unreasonably the supply of goods to consumers or the provision of any service.
• To result in a deterioration in the quality of any goods or in the performance of any service.
A restrictive trade practice is a trade practice which has the effect, actual or probable of restricting, lessening or destroying competition. Such trade practices may tend to obstruct the flow of production or to bring about manipulation of prices or conditions of delivery etc. to the common detriment.
The distinction between the two is based, perhaps, on the Monopolies Inquiry Commission, which confined the word "restrictive trade practices" to mean restrictive trade practices other than those pursued by Monopolist.
An unfair trade practice means a trade practice, which, for the purpose of promoting any sale, use of supply of any goods or serviice, adopts unfair method, or unfair or deceptive practice.
Unfair trade practice may be categorised as under:
• False representation
• Bargain Price
• Offering of gifts and prizes
• Non-compliance of prescribed standards
• Hoarding or destruction of goods
Falsely suggests that the goods are of a particular standard quality, quantity, grade, composition, style or model. Falsely suggests any re-bulit, second-hand renovated, reconditioned or old goods as new goods. Makes a false or misleading representation concerning the need for, or the usefulness of, any good and services. Materially misleads about the prices at which such goods or services are available in the market.
The price stated in the advertisement in such manner as suggests that it is lesser than the ordinary price. The price which any person coming across the advertisement would believe to be better than the price at which such goods are ordinarily sold.
Creating impression that something is being offered free along with the goods, when in fact the price is wholly or partly covered by the price of the article sold. Offering some prizes to the buyers by the conduct of any contest, lottery or game of chance or skill, with real intention to promote sales or business.
Any sale or supply of goods, for use by consumers, knowing or having reason to believe that the goods do not comply with the standards prescribed by some competent authority, in relation to their performance, composition, contents, design, construction, finishing or packing, as are necessary to prevent or reduce the risk of injury to the person using such goods, shall amount to an unfair trade practice.
Any practice that permits the hoarding or destruction of goods, or refusal to sell the goods or provide any services, with the intention to raise the cost of those or those similar goods or services, shall be an unfair trade practice.
In accordance with the provisions of the Act, the Government of India has set up a commission known as the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Commission. The act Provides that the commission shall consists of a chairman, and not less than two and not more than eight other members, to be appointed by the Central Government.
1. Power of civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, with respect to
• Summoning and enforcing the attendance of any witness and examining him on oath
• Discovery and production of any document or other material object
• Producible as evidence
• Reception of evidence on affidavits
• Requisition of any public record from any court or office
• Issuing any commission for examination of witness
• Appearance of parties and consequence of non-appearance
2. Proceedings before the commission are deemed as judicial Proceedings with in the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. To require any person to produce before it and to examine and keep any books of accounts or other documents relating to the trade practice, in its custody.
4. To require any person to furnish such information as respects the trade practice as may be required or such other information as may be in his possession in relation to the trade carried on by any other person.
5. To authorise any of its officers to enter and search any undertaking or seize any books or papers, relating to the undertaking, in relation to which the inquiry is being made, if the commission suspects that such books or papers are being or may be destroyed, mutilated, altered, falsified or secreted.
Where, during any injury, the commission is satisfied that any undertaking or any person is carrying on, or is about to carry on, any monopolistic, restrictive or unfair trade practice, which is a pre-judicial to the public interest or the interest of any trader or class of traders generally, or of any customer or class of customers, or consumers generally, the commission may grant a temporary Injunction restraining such undertaking or person form carrying on such practice until the conclusion of inquiry or until further orders.
Where any monopolistic, restrictive or unfair trade practice has caused damage to any Government, or trade or consumer, an application may be made to the commission asking for compensation, and the commission may award appropriate compensation. Where any such loss or damage is caused to a number of persons having the same interest, compensation can be claimed with the permission of commission, by any of them on behalf of all of them.